Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 22.06.2025 03:25

“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
3 keys to success every Citadel intern learns their first week on the job - Business Insider
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Let’s just make it real clear:
AI Plays, MercadoLibre Lead Five Stocks Near Buy Points - Investor's Business Daily
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
What is some advice for a business?
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Carbon capture method mines cement ingredients from the air - Tech Xplore
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Thank you.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
What does pompano fish taste like?
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
What’s next?
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.